[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
NEON- Re: rubber boots - followup
> Sorry if this subject is getting boring to everyone - but it's important
> that the wrong impression not be left with everyone. Herb called me this
> AM at 9:00. He had already been in contact with CSA officials, reamed the
> one guy a new poopy, so he's now ready to officially tell the truth about
> Masters Tech products. John, if you would, call the same guy again. It
> seems that their files had not been made current since the first of the
> year. At least that is their excuse. The Masters Tech products are all
> legal for exterior, WET,
I talked to Lee Rodgers again today. He is discussin with Herb (at
Masters) and the engineer who actually did the testing on Masters boots,
to give a more "official" response to this in a week or so. I'll let
you know what he says.
He did stress, that as of today (Thursday): he's standing by his
original statement that the Master' boots have not been evaluated for
outside, exposed to the weather use.
I also called UL again today, and am working with an engineer in _their_
Lighting Products division. Should hear something from them next week
too about plastic boots outside. With UL, I'm inquiring about ANY
plastic boots, not just the Masters - so mabye we can get a sense of
where these products fall in the listing game. I talked with them
(again) about Masters, but I'm going to wait until I get their followup
to elaborate.
If there's one thing I've learned this week, it's that the listing game
is complicated. Lot's of exceptions, side-notes, and/if's, etc.
I hope too that everyone sees this as a quest for clarification, not as
a vendetta against Master's or Electrobits (both of who's products I've
used).
-John
References: