The Neon Bender's BBS!
The Archive no longer allows posting but search of hundreds of previous posts are available
If you have any questions please
contact us.
[Please Read]
|
Re: Mercury in Vermont
Posted By: SVP Neon Equipment In Response To: Re: Mercury in Vermont (TerryM)
Date: Saturday, 10 February 2007, at 3:12 p.m.
> You want to be a millionaire? Figure out an
> alternative to mercury. It just seems to me
> that with all our technology we could come
> up with something else that would brighten a
> flourescent tube. There was someone making a
> prototype of an electrode that used no
> mercury. I had some samples that I never
> tried and now I can't seem to find them. Did
> anyone here try them and what did you think?> Terry
Fluorescent lamp mfgs. have been working on it for years without success. And you are right: IF a true alternative could be found that did not harm the environment there would be some wealthy people as a result.
There were numerous people who tried the "mercuryless" electrode samples. Without question, they did have mercury in them. It was sort of disguised as something else, but it was there nonetheless. The bad part is, it was inside the electrode, so whenever you bombarded them you had mercury being pulled through your entire manifold system.
|
Neon Bender's BBS! is maintained by Kenny with WebBBS 5.12.
This page Copyright © 1996-2005 Krypton Neon